Safe Security Autonomous CTEM vs Zafran: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Safe Security Autonomous CTEM: Autonomous CTEM platform for managing exposure risk with AI agents. built by Safe Security. Core capabilities include Unified exposure visibility with 100+ tool integrations, Dynamic exposure scoring with Cyber Risk Quantification, AI-driven threat intelligence and attack path analysis..

Zafran: Exposure management platform for vulnerability discovery, assessment & remediation. built by Zafran. Core capabilities include Continuous vulnerability discovery across hybrid cloud environments, Agentless vulnerability scanning for Windows and Linux systems, Vulnerability data aggregation and normalization from multiple sources..

Both serve the Exposure Management market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Safe Security Autonomous CTEM differentiates with Unified exposure visibility with 100+ tool integrations, Dynamic exposure scoring with Cyber Risk Quantification, AI-driven threat intelligence and attack path analysis. Zafran differentiates with Continuous vulnerability discovery across hybrid cloud environments, Agentless vulnerability scanning for Windows and Linux systems, Vulnerability data aggregation and normalization from multiple sources.

Safe Security Autonomous CTEM is developed by Safe Security. Zafran is developed by Zafran. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Safe Security Autonomous CTEM integrates with ITSM, AWS, Slack, Okta. Zafran integrates with ServiceNow, Jira, EDR platforms, Cloud platforms, WAF and 1 more. Check integration compatibility with your existing security stack before deciding.

Safe Security Autonomous CTEM and Zafran serve similar Exposure Management use cases: both are Exposure Management tools. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.