Community Security Analytics (CSA) vs Recog: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Community Security Analytics (CSA) is a free threat hunting tool. Recog is a free threat hunting tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best threat hunting fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Community Security Analytics (CSA)
Security teams using Google Cloud who need threat hunting queries fast will get immediate value from Community Security Analytics; the 366 GitHub stars and pre-built rule library mean you skip months of query writing and jump straight to detecting GCP-native threats across Logs, BigQuery, and Chronicle. The free pricing removes budget friction for smaller teams or those piloting threat hunting before buying commercial tools. Skip this if your environment is multi-cloud or hybrid on-premises; CSA is built specifically for GCP log sources and won't translate cleanly to AWS or Azure detection use cases.
Security teams running manual threat hunts or building custom detection workflows will extract the most from Recog because its fingerprinting approach identifies obscured services and hardware that signature-based tools consistently miss. The 742 GitHub stars and active community fork activity signal real adoption in IR and red team environments, not just a proof-of-concept framework. Skip this if you need automated scanning at scale or point-and-click ease; Recog demands operational knowledge to tune probes and interpret results, which is exactly why experienced hunters prefer it.
