Reach Security - MS E3/E5 Optimization vs ThreatMate: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Reach Security - MS E3/E5 Optimization

Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in Microsoft security feature sprawl should use Reach Security - MS E3/E5 Optimization to stop paying for unused E5 capabilities and fix the E3 configs that actually matter. It maps your current setup against real attack telemetry, then tells you which security controls you're leaving on the table, which ones are misconfigured, and whether the E5 upgrade is worth the spend for your threat profile. Skip this if you've already got deep Microsoft security expertise in-house or you're not willing to act on upgrade recommendations; the value sits entirely in closing the gap between what you own and what you're actually running.

ThreatMate

MSPs managing security posture across dozens of client tenants will see immediate ROI from ThreatMate's automated pentesting paired with exploitability scoring; it surfaces real attack paths instead of noise and feeds directly into remediation prioritization. The multi-tenant architecture with inherited settings and CISA-aligned M365 checks mean you're not rebuilding policy for every client, and the client-ready executive reports actually close the feedback loop with non-technical stakeholders. This is not the tool for buyers who need deep threat hunting or incident response capabilities; ThreatMate prioritizes vulnerability validation and exposure management over post-breach analysis.