ON2IT Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) vs Quantara AI Dynamic Cyber Risk Quantification: 2026 Comparison

ON2IT Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ)

Mid-market and enterprise security leaders who need to justify cybersecurity spend to boards and insurers should start with ON2IT Cyber Risk Quantification because it converts vulnerability data into dollar figures that CFOs and audit committees actually understand. The tool maps your protect surface, rates control maturity across IT, OT, and cloud environments, and generates SEC and DORA-compliant evidence packs automatically, with 24x7 SOC monitoring baked in. Skip this if your organization has already solved the business case problem or if you're still in the early stages of asset visibility; CRQ assumes you've got baseline hygiene and need to communicate residual risk upward, not build foundational controls from scratch.

Quantara AI Dynamic Cyber Risk Quantification

Enterprise and mid-market security leaders who need to translate risk into board language should use Quantara AI Dynamic Cyber Risk Quantification, because it quantifies cyber exposure in financial terms ($VaR) that CFOs and audit committees actually understand, not risk scores. The platform maps vulnerability and control maturity to real dollar impact, integrates with major vulnerability and threat data sources like Tenable and Wiz, and aligns to NIST GV.RM and GV.OV, making it purpose-built for ERM strategy alignment. Skip this if your organization hasn't yet moved beyond traditional risk scoring or lacks the data hygiene to feed accurate financial models; garbage data in means garbage board reports out.