Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Pomerium Pomerium Zero is a commercial zero trust network access tool by Pomerium. Soliton Systems G/On is a commercial zero trust network access tool by Soliton Systems. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best zero trust network access fit for your security stack.
Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise teams replacing VPN with Zero Trust network access will value Pomerium Pomerium Zero's clientless architecture, which eliminates the endpoint agent burden that slows adoption in distributed workforces. The platform scores strongly on NIST PR.AA (Identity Management) and supports just-in-time access provisioning with time-bound controls, meaning you're not managing standing privileges at scale. Skip this if your primary concern is detection and response; Pomerium prioritizes access control and continuous monitoring over threat hunting, and you'll need a separate EDR layer for that story.
Mid-market and enterprise teams replacing VPN with zero-trust remote access will find G/On's USB-key client the least disruptive path; no installation means adoption friction drops on unmanaged devices, and the portable form factor solves the "what if I switch laptops" problem that software-only SDP solutions create. Three NIST CSF 2.0 coverage areas including PR.AA and continuous monitoring reflect legitimate identity and access control enforcement. Skip this if your workforce needs clientless browser-based access or your risk model demands agent-based endpoint telemetry; G/On prioritizes network segmentation over visibility into device posture.
Clientless secure remote access platform with Zero Trust architecture
VPN-alternative SDP providing zero-trust secure remote access via USB key.
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPNo reviews yet
No reviews yet
Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
Common questions about comparing Pomerium Pomerium Zero vs Soliton Systems G/On for your zero trust network access needs.
Pomerium Pomerium Zero: Clientless secure remote access platform with Zero Trust architecture. built by Pomerium. Core capabilities include Clientless remote access, Just-in-time access provisioning, Time-bound access controls..
Soliton Systems G/On: VPN-alternative SDP providing zero-trust secure remote access via USB key. built by Soliton Systems. Core capabilities include Software-defined perimeter replacing VPN connections, Zero-trust access policy allowing only verified users, Portable USB key-based client requiring no installation..
Both serve the Zero Trust Network Access market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.
Pomerium Pomerium Zero differentiates with Clientless remote access, Just-in-time access provisioning, Time-bound access controls. Soliton Systems G/On differentiates with Software-defined perimeter replacing VPN connections, Zero-trust access policy allowing only verified users, Portable USB key-based client requiring no installation.
Pomerium Pomerium Zero is developed by Pomerium. Soliton Systems G/On is developed by Soliton Systems. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.
Pomerium Pomerium Zero and Soliton Systems G/On serve similar Zero Trust Network Access use cases: both are Zero Trust Network Access tools, both cover ZTNA, Remote Access. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.
Get strategic cybersecurity insights in your inbox