PKWARE PK Protect vs Protegrity Data Protection Platform: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

PKWARE PK Protect

Mid-market and enterprise security teams with sensitive data spread across mainframes, databases, and cloud will get the most from PKWARE PK Protect; mainframe data protection via copybooks is genuinely rare in this category and solves a real problem legacy tools ignore. The platform covers ID.AM and ID.RA well through discovery and classification across hybrid environments, though its data masking and redaction lean toward output protection rather than preventing exfiltration at rest. Skip this if your primary concern is endpoint DLP in motion or if you need a single pane of glass for network and data security; PK Protect is deliberately focused on data itself, not the channels it travels through.

Protegrity Data Protection Platform

Enterprise security teams protecting sensitive data across fragmented infrastructure,databases, data warehouses, and big data platforms simultaneously,should choose Protegrity Data Protection Platform because it encrypts and masks data at rest within those systems rather than forcing you to pipe everything through a separate gateway. The platform covers Oracle, SQL Server, Snowflake, Redshift, Teradata, Cloudera, and mainframe DB2 in a single control plane, which saves the operational overhead of managing point solutions for each stack. Skip this if your data lives primarily in SaaS applications or you need CSPM; Protegrity is strongest where data stays on-premises or in your own cloud accounts.