Furl Platform is a commercial exposure management tool by furl. Onit Security is a commercial exposure management tool by Onit Security. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best exposure management fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in vulnerability backlogs will see immediate ROI from Furl Platform because it actually closes the remediation gap instead of just surfacing more findings. The AI generates per-device fix scripts and coordinates stakeholder execution, cutting the manual work that typically stalls 60% of patches; SOC 2 Type 2 compliance and integrations with Automox and Jamf mean you're not ripping out existing tools. Skip this if your organization wants a vulnerability scanner or detection layer; Furl assumes you already have those and is built entirely around the "what do we actually fix and by when" problem.
AI platform that automates vuln remediation with per-device scripts & coordination.
AI-driven platform resolving vuln exposures via persistent, reusable decisions.
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPNo reviews yet
No reviews yet
Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
Common questions about comparing Furl Platform vs Onit Security for your exposure management needs.
Furl Platform: AI platform that automates vuln remediation with per-device scripts & coordination. built by furl. headquartered in United States. Core capabilities include AI-powered autonomous vulnerability remediation, Per-device tailored remediation script generation, Remediation Projects for grouping and prioritizing tasks..
Onit Security: AI-driven platform resolving vuln exposures via persistent, reusable decisions. built by Onit Security. Core capabilities include Decision surfacing: maps vulnerabilities to business decisions rather than severity scores alone, Impact assessment: evaluates exposures against business and environmental context, Owner assignment: automatically determines and assigns remediation ownership..
Both serve the Exposure Management market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.
Get strategic cybersecurity insights in your inbox
