ocaml-yara vs Static File Analyzer (SFA): Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
ocaml-yara is a free detection engineering tool. Static File Analyzer (SFA) is a free detection engineering tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best detection engineering fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
OCaml developers who need malware detection baked directly into their applications should consider ocaml-yara; it's the only straightforward way to call YARA rules from OCaml without subprocess overhead or language bindings friction. The tool uses Ctypes for direct C interop, meaning you get YARA's pattern matching engine without wrapping complexity. Skip this if your team isn't already committed to OCaml or if you need a maintained, production-hardened library; with 12 GitHub stars and no commercial backing, you're accepting some risk on future updates and edge case handling.
Incident responders and malware analysts working with limited budgets will find Static File Analyzer most useful for rapid file triage when ClamAV and YARA signatures are sufficient for your threat model. The visual tree graphs and scoring system accelerate pattern extraction during investigation, and the free pricing removes procurement friction for lean teams. Skip this if your environment demands proprietary threat intelligence, machine learning-based detection, or integration with commercial sandbox platforms; SFA's strength is file-level analysis, not behavioral detonation.
