Native Security Platform vs SubImage: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Native Security Platform: CNAPP providing unified cloud security posture, workload, and app protection. built by Native Security. Core capabilities include Cloud security posture management (CSPM), Cloud workload protection, Attack path analysis..

SubImage: Agentless CNAPP that maps cloud/SaaS/on-prem assets into a queryable security graph. built by SubImage. Core capabilities include Agentless, read-only API-based connectivity to cloud, SaaS, and on-prem environments, Continuous asset discovery and inventory mapped into a unified security graph, Misconfiguration detection across cloud infrastructure and SaaS services..

Both serve the Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Native Security Platform differentiates with Cloud security posture management (CSPM), Cloud workload protection, Attack path analysis. SubImage differentiates with Agentless, read-only API-based connectivity to cloud, SaaS, and on-prem environments, Continuous asset discovery and inventory mapped into a unified security graph, Misconfiguration detection across cloud infrastructure and SaaS services.

Native Security Platform is developed by Native Security. SubImage is developed by SubImage. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Native Security Platform and SubImage serve similar Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform use cases: both are Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform tools, both cover Cloud Native, Misconfiguration, Attack Paths. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.