Mi-Token vs OneLogin Virtual LDAP Service: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Mi-Token: MFA & SSO solution with hard/soft token support and AD integration. built by Mi-Token. Core capabilities include Multi-factor authentication (MFA) via hard and soft tokens, Soft tokens for iOS, Android, BlackBerry, Windows Mobile, and SMS, Token independence supporting any OATH-compliant hard token..

OneLogin Virtual LDAP Service: Cloud-based LDAP service for hybrid enterprise authentication and directory access. built by OneLogin. Core capabilities include Cloud-based LDAP directory service, LDAP interface for cloud directories, High availability and scalability..

Both serve the Multi-Factor Authentication and Single Sign-On market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Mi-Token differentiates with Multi-factor authentication (MFA) via hard and soft tokens, Soft tokens for iOS, Android, BlackBerry, Windows Mobile, and SMS, Token independence supporting any OATH-compliant hard token. OneLogin Virtual LDAP Service differentiates with Cloud-based LDAP directory service, LDAP interface for cloud directories, High availability and scalability.

Mi-Token is developed by Mi-Token. OneLogin Virtual LDAP Service is developed by OneLogin. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Mi-Token and OneLogin Virtual LDAP Service serve similar Multi-Factor Authentication and Single Sign-On use cases: both are Multi-Factor Authentication and Single Sign-On tools, both cover Authentication, MFA, Active Directory. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.