Mend Container vs Plexicus Container Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Mend Container

SMB and mid-market teams shipping containers without visibility into their dependencies should start with Mend Container; its reachability analysis cuts through noise by prioritizing only the vulnerabilities that actually matter to your supply chain. The tool maps open source exposure across your container images and CI/CD pipelines, addressing the GV.SC supply chain risk mandate that most teams ignore until an audit forces their hand. Skip this if your organization already runs a mature SBOM program or needs runtime detection; Mend Container is scanning-first, not built to catch exploits in motion.

Plexicus Container Security

Teams building containerized applications on tight budgets should evaluate Plexicus Container Security for its runtime threat detection and automated response capabilities, which catch post-deployment attacks that image scanning alone misses. The platform covers the full shift-left-to-runtime arc with hardcoded secrets detection, CVE scanning, Kubernetes policy enforcement, and continuous monitoring, mapping to NIST ID.RA and DE.CM functions most buyers actually need. Skip this if you're looking for a broader CNAPP that handles cloud infrastructure or VMs; Plexicus stays focused on containers and Kubernetes, which is exactly why smaller teams without dedicated platform security engineers will move faster with it.