IDECSI Permission Explorer vs Matrix42: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

IDECSI Permission Explorer

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing sprawling Microsoft 365 and file server environments should pick Permission Explorer for its forensic depth on permission creep; most competitors offer visibility or recertification, but this tool actually connects the dots between overexposed data, user activity, and incident investigation in one platform. The real differentiator is MIP classification integration paired with multi-criteria search, which lets you find sensitive data that's accessible to the wrong people without running separate discovery tools. Skip this if your organization primarily uses cloud-native SaaS applications outside Microsoft 365; Permission Explorer's strength is Windows and on-premises hybrid scenarios, not blanket SaaS access governance.

Matrix42

Mid-market and enterprise IT teams managing both identity governance and endpoint sprawl should start with Matrix42 if your organization runs on-premises or hybrid infrastructure and needs data sovereignty controls; the platform's coverage of ID.AM and PR.AA through unified asset discovery and access control, combined with UEM and IGA in one deployment, eliminates tool fragmentation across those functions. The German headquarters and cloud data residency options matter if you operate under GDPR or similar regional compliance requirements. Skip this if you're purely cloud-native SaaS or need best-of-breed point solutions in each category; Matrix42 trades some depth in endpoint detection for breadth in asset and identity management.