Macro_Pack vs InvalidSign: 2026 Comparison
Macro_Pack is a free offensive security tool. InvalidSign is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers and red teamers who need to rapidly generate obfuscated Office payloads without manual encoding will find Macro_Pack indispensable; the free cost and 2,300 GitHub stars reflect its adoption across professional assessments. The tool excels at shortening payload development cycles by automating VBA obfuscation techniques that would otherwise require custom scripting, making it particularly valuable for teams running multiple concurrent engagements. Skip this if your assessment scope excludes client-side Office exploitation or if your toolchain already includes mature payload generation frameworks; Macro_Pack solves one problem exceptionally well rather than replacing a full C2 platform.
Red team operators and offensive security researchers validating endpoint detection gaps will find InvalidSign useful for its straightforward approach to signature evasion through hash manipulation of legitimately signed binaries. The tool is free and open-source, lowering barriers to testing your own defensive posture. This is not a replacement for behavioral detection tuning or a tool for teams whose EDR already flags execution context anomalies; InvalidSign assumes signature-based controls remain your primary detection layer.
