mach_inject vs task_vaccine: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
mach_inject is a free offensive security tool. task_vaccine is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
macOS red teamers and security researchers validating endpoint defenses will get the most from mach_inject because it's the lightest-weight code injection primitive for testing whether macOS processes properly restrict cross-process memory writes. The 831 GitHub stars and active fork ecosystem reflect sustained use in adversary emulation workflows where you need injectable payloads without the overhead of framework dependencies. Skip this if you're building detection logic for Windows or Linux environments, or if your testing requires graphical interaction simulation; mach_inject is purely injection-focused and won't help you there.
Red teamers and penetration testers on macOS will find task_vaccine valuable for its lightweight code injection capability across Intel and ARM architectures without requiring kernel extensions. The 54 GitHub stars and active maintenance reflect adoption among practitioners who need quick, reliable injection for post-exploitation work. Skip this if you're looking for injection frameworks with cross-platform Windows support or a full C2 infrastructure; task_vaccine is deliberately minimal and OS X specific.
