Lambda-Proxy vs PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy): Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Lambda-Proxy is a free penetration testing tool. PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy) is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers validating Lambda function security will find Lambda-Proxy invaluable for exposing SQL injection vulnerabilities that standard web application scanners miss, since it bridges SQLMap directly into AWS Lambda invoke calls through a local proxy. The tool is free and already battle-tested by security researchers, requiring no licensing overhead or vendor lock-in. Skip this if your team needs broad infrastructure scanning or compliance automation; Lambda-Proxy solves one problem exceptionally well and makes no apologies for the narrow scope.
PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy)
Penetration testers who need fine-grained control over request and response manipulation will find PETEP worth the setup cost; it's Java-based, open-source, and free, which means no licensing friction for red teams running custom test scenarios. The 225 GitHub stars and active Java ecosystem reflect real adoption among practitioners who value the ability to write custom plugins rather than fight against vendor constraints. Skip it if your team expects a polished UI or needs out-of-box integrations with commercial vulnerability scanners; PETEP rewards operators comfortable building their own toolchain.
