IronNet IronRadar vs Yomi: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
IronNet IronRadar is a commercial threat intelligence platforms tool by IronNet. Yomi is a free threat intelligence platforms tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best threat intelligence platforms fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise SOC teams that need early visibility into adversary command-and-control infrastructure should prioritize IronNet IronRadar, since most threat feeds react to known C2 after it's operational, not before. The platform's collective defense model means you're detecting infrastructure weeks earlier than traditional feeds by pulling from a shared sensor network across participating organizations. Skip this if you're looking for a general-purpose threat intelligence platform; IronRadar is deliberately narrow,it trades breadth for speed on one specific attack vector.
Security teams building threat response workflows around external intelligence feeds will find value in Yomi's free model, which removes budget friction from adding a real-time data layer. The zero cost entry point makes sense for mid-market shops piloting threat intel integration without committing to commercial platforms. Skip Yomi if your team needs enrichment depth or custom feed integration; free threat intelligence platforms typically prioritize breadth of sources over the normalized, queryable intelligence that mature SOCs depend on for investigation velocity.
