IOC Parser vs Lunar: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
IOC Parser is a free threat intelligence platforms tool. Lunar is a free threat intelligence platforms tool by Webz.io. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best threat intelligence platforms fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Threat analysts drowning in PDF-based threat reports will find IOC Parser invaluable for the one job it does: extracting indicators without manual copy-paste drudgery. At 439 GitHub stars with zero licensing friction, it's proven enough in security teams that actually read threat intel at scale. Skip this if you need a platform that correlates IOCs against your network or enriches them with context; IOC Parser stops at extraction, which means you're still feeding the results into your SIEM or TIP yourself.
Security teams managing breach aftermath and credential exposure across multiple domains should adopt Lunar for its real-time infostealer log intelligence, which surfaces compromised credentials faster than waiting for breach notifications. The platform ingests large-scale daily breach data and prioritizes service-level context for remediation, directly supporting the NIST Detect function of continuous monitoring and incident characterization. Skip this if you need post-compromise forensics or threat hunting beyond credential validation; Lunar is detection and alerting first, not investigation.
