InQL vs Miggo Security: 2026 Comparison
InQL is a free dynamic application security testing tool. Miggo Security is a commercial dynamic application security testing tool by Miggo. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best dynamic application security testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
GraphQL API teams embedded in Burp Suite workflows should adopt InQL for its native introspection enumeration and mutation testing capabilities; it catches schema poisoning and input validation gaps that standard web proxies miss entirely. The tool is free and maintains 1,671 GitHub stars, reflecting active community contribution to its attack patterns. Skip this if your GraphQL APIs sit behind strict WAF rules or if you need post-exploitation forensics; InQL excels at discovery and fuzzing but doesn't track API behavior anomalies.
Mid-market and enterprise teams running distributed applications need runtime visibility that actually stops attacks in flight, not just logs them hours later. Miggo Security prioritizes continuous monitoring and automated response at the application layer, covering DE.CM and RS.MI functions that most DAST tools ignore once they hand off findings to your queue. Skip this if you're looking for static code analysis or need deep SAST integration; Miggo is built for teams who've already shipped code and need to catch exploits happening right now.
