Who makes Impacket vs Kiterunner?

**Impacket** is open-source with 14,808 GitHub stars. **Kiterunner** is open-source with 3,119 GitHub stars. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Is Impacket a good alternative to Kiterunner?

Impacket and Kiterunner serve similar Offensive Security use cases: both are Offensive Security tools. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

Impacket vs Kiterunner: Features, Integrations, Reviews (2026) | CybersecTools

Impacket vs Kiterunner: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Q: What is the difference between Impacket vs Kiterunner?

**Impacket**: A Python library for working with network protocols.. **Kiterunner**: Kiterunner is a tool for lightning-fast traditional content discovery and bruteforcing API endpoints in modern applications.. Both serve the Offensive Security market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.

Impacket is a free offensive security tool. Kiterunner is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.

CST Verdict

Based on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:

Impacket

Red teamers and penetration testers who need to build custom attack chains will find Impacket indispensable; its Python-native SMB, Kerberos, and NTLM implementations let you craft protocol-level attacks that commercial tools either can't do or won't let you customize. The 14,800+ GitHub stars reflect real adoption in offensive engagements, and the library's low-level protocol handling means you can exploit edge cases that signature-based defenses miss. Skip this if your team wants a point-and-click interface; Impacket demands Python fluency and assumes you understand the protocols you're weaponizing.

Data verified May 2026