Habu Hacking Toolkit vs SubOver: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Habu Hacking Toolkit is a free penetration testing tool. SubOver is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams building internal red team capacity on a budget should reach for Habu Hacking Toolkit; it gives you Python-native attack primitives that integrate cleanly into custom exploitation workflows without licensing friction. The 973 GitHub stars and active maintenance signal a tool mature enough for repeatable penetration testing scenarios. Skip this if your team needs a GUI-driven platform or commercial support; Habu demands Python fluency and rewards operators who read code, not buttons.
Penetration testers and bug bounty hunters will move fast with SubOver because it automates subdomain enumeration and takeover detection without the setup overhead of commercial platforms. The tool has nearly 1,000 GitHub stars and costs nothing, making it the obvious first pass before you escalate to manual verification or paid scanners. Skip this if you need continuous monitoring integrated with your attack surface management stack; SubOver is built for one-off assessments, not persistent surveillance of your DNS posture.
