GridPot vs Miniprint: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
GridPot is a free honeypots & deception tool. Miniprint is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Power grid operators and critical infrastructure teams testing ICS attack scenarios need GridPot because it simulates realistic grid environments without requiring expensive hardware; the framework's integration of GridLAB-D for power system dynamics with Conpot's industrial protocol emulation means you can detect attacks against SCADA systems that generic honeypots miss. The 61 GitHub stars and free pricing make this accessible for proof-of-concept work, but GridPot is built for detection-heavy operations; it won't help teams focused on forensics or incident response workflows after an attack surfaces.
Detection teams running flat networks or testing perimeter segmentation will get immediate value from Miniprint because it creates a convincing printer trap that actually logs PJL protocol interactions attackers rarely encounter elsewhere. The 203 GitHub stars and zero-friction deployment as a virtual filesystem make it fast to spin up for red team exercises or internal network monitoring. Skip this if you need honeypots covering multiple services or attackers sophisticated enough to verify printer authenticity; Miniprint excels at catching reconnaissance and lateral movement but won't fool adversaries doing deep device fingerprinting.
