FYEO Enterprise Threat Model vs GrammaTech ConfINE: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

FYEO Enterprise Threat Model

Mid-market and enterprise security teams with fragmented risk conversations across business units will see the most value in FYEO Enterprise Threat Model; it forces structured asset cataloging and threat scoping that actually sticks, rather than letting risk assessments languish in spreadsheets. The service covers all four NIST GV and ID risk management functions, meaning stakeholders get aligned on what matters before you're halfway through remediation. Skip this if your organization has already mapped critical assets and runs mature threat modeling in-house; FYEO is built for teams starting from scattered baselines, not optimizing established processes.

GrammaTech ConfINE

Enterprise security architects responsible for insider threat programs and complex network access control will find real value in ConfINE's attack graph modeling, which surfaces privilege chains and lateral movement paths that standard vulnerability scanners miss. The tool maps access control properties across networked systems using formal logic, giving you forensic-grade clarity on how an attacker or insider could move from initial compromise to critical assets. Skip this if your organization lacks the security engineering depth to operationalize attack graphs or if you need real-time detection; ConfINE is a planning and investigation tool, not a monitoring platform.