GAUNTLT vs Mend DAST: 2026 Comparison
GAUNTLT is a free dynamic application security testing tool. Mend DAST is a commercial dynamic application security testing tool by Mend.io. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best dynamic application security testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
DevOps and security teams running continuous integration pipelines will get the most from GAUNTLT because it embeds security testing directly into build workflows without requiring separate scanning infrastructure. The free pricing model means you can start stress-testing applications for logic flaws and runtime vulnerabilities before spending budget on enterprise DAST tools. Skip GAUNTLT if your team needs guided remediation or a UI-first experience; it's built for engineers who write tests, not security analysts who point and click.
Teams shipping web applications and APIs who need runtime vulnerability detection without waiting for code review cycles will find Mend DAST's integration into active CI/CD pipelines the core strength here. The tool tests running applications directly rather than static artifacts, which catches logic flaws and configuration issues that SAST alone misses. Skip this if your primary concern is pre-deployment scanning or you need deep API fuzzing capabilities; Mend DAST excels at catching what's live, not preventing what might ship.
