Gato vs Sudomy: 2026 Comparison
Gato is a free penetration testing tool. Sudomy is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
DevSecOps teams running GitHub Actions at scale need Gato because it's the only tool that systematically maps and exploits CI/CD pipeline misconfigurations before attackers do. With 701 GitHub stars and active community validation, it's proven effective at exposing credential exposure and privilege escalation paths in workflow files that static scanners routinely miss. Skip this if your GitHub Actions usage is light or your CI/CD security program already includes runtime controls; Gato is purpose-built for teams treating pipeline compromise as a material risk, not a checkbox.
Bug bounty hunters and solo pentesters who need fast subdomain discovery without vendor lock-in should reach for Sudomy; it combines multiple enumeration sources into a single CLI tool that costs nothing and runs offline. The 2,241 GitHub stars reflect active maintenance and real adoption in the bounty community, where speed and portability matter more than UI polish. Skip this if your team needs a web dashboard, API integrations with your ticketing system, or support for complex enterprise environments; Sudomy is built for individual researchers who prefer command-line tools and self-contained workflows.
