FireEye Detection On Demand vs RTFSig: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
FireEye Detection On Demand is a commercial malware analysis tool by FireEye. RTFSig is a free malware analysis tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best malware analysis fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Security teams needing fast, authoritative malware verdicts on suspicious files and URLs should run them through FireEye Detection On Demand before deciding whether to block or investigate further. The cloud API processes submissions through FireEye's actual execution engine rather than signature matching alone, giving you analysis depth typically reserved for expensive incident response retainers. Skip this if your team lacks API integration bandwidth or needs behavioral analysis of binaries already running on endpoints; Detection On Demand is triage and verification, not continuous monitoring.
Incident responders and malware analysts who need to quickly triage RTF-based phishing attachments should use RTFSig to extract and fingerprint suspicious structural elements that commodity AV misses. The tool's free, open-source design means zero procurement friction for resource-constrained security teams running limited forensics pipelines. Skip this if you're looking for an automated detection engine; RTFSig is a manual analysis helper that requires operator judgment to interpret signature output, not a fire-and-forget scanning tool.
