File Scanning Framework (FSF) v1.1 vs Unknown Cyber Magic™: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

File Scanning Framework (FSF) v1.1

Incident response teams with mature Yara rule libraries will extract the most value from File Scanning Framework v1.1 because it actually executes those signatures recursively across nested file structures instead of stopping at the container boundary. The modular architecture means analysts can chain custom extraction and analysis logic without forking the codebase; the 294 GitHub stars reflect adoption by teams treating this as a core forensics utility rather than a one-off scanner. Skip this if your team lacks in-house malware analysis expertise or expects a UI; FSF is a command-line framework that demands you know what you're looking for before you start scanning.

Unknown Cyber Magic™

Incident responders and threat analysts at startups through mid-market will move fastest with Unknown Cyber Magic™ because the chat interface cuts analysis time on unknown files without requiring manual sandbox navigation or YARA rule writing. The platform covers DE.AE and RS.AN strongly (anomaly characterization and incident investigation), meaning you get forensics-grade malware breakdown paired with usable intelligence, not just verdicts. Skip this if your team needs post-incident recovery orchestration or if you're enterprise-scale with strict vendor consolidation mandates; Unknown Cyber is deliberately analysis-focused and small enough that you'll be one of their largest accounts.