fatt vs NETRESEC: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
fatt is a free digital forensics and incident response tool. NETRESEC is a free digital forensics and incident response tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best digital forensics and incident response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Incident response teams who need to pivot quickly from packet captures to threat hunting will find fatt indispensable; it extracts JA3 and HASSH fingerprints that let you correlate C2 signatures across your full traffic history in minutes instead of hours. Free and 679 GitHub stars means it's already baked into most mature IR playbooks, lowering your team's time-to-triage on network-based indicators. Skip this if you're looking for packet analysis beyond metadata extraction or need a GUI; fatt is CLI-only and does one job well, which is exactly why it works.
Incident responders and forensics teams working with network captures and suspicious traffic will get the most from NETRESEC's tools; the software excels at packet analysis and network reconstruction where commercial alternatives charge licensing fees that don't justify the capability gap. Tools like NetworkMiner and Zeek are free and run on modest hardware, making them practical for IR teams that need to pivot quickly without vendor approval cycles. Skip this if your team needs integration with your SIEM or wants guided investigation workflows; NETRESEC prioritizes raw technical capability over hand-holding, and that's by design.
