ExploitDB vs getallurls (gau): Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
ExploitDB is a free penetration testing tool. getallurls (gau) is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers and red teams validating their attack surface need ExploitDB for its indexed proof-of-concept code tied directly to CVEs; you'll spend less time hunting GitHub for working exploits and more time running them. The archive covers over 20,000 public exploits with active maintenance, which matters when you're building a test plan against known vulnerabilities. Skip this if your org needs exploit intelligence abstracted into risk ratings or automated scanning; ExploitDB is a reference library, not a vulnerability scanner.
Penetration testers and bug bounty hunters doing reconnaissance will move faster with getallurls than manually querying individual URL sources; it aggregates results from CommonCrawl, URLScan, and Wayback Machine in a single pass. The tool has 4,549 GitHub stars and runs for free, making it a no-friction addition to any recon workflow. Skip this if you need real-time monitoring or filtered results; getallurls surfaces historical URLs without deduplication or relevance ranking, leaving you to sort signal from noise.
