Evo RADIUS vs UserLock: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Evo RADIUS is a commercial multi-factor authentication and single sign-on tool by Evo Security. UserLock is a commercial multi-factor authentication and single sign-on tool by IS Decisions. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best multi-factor authentication and single sign-on fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
MSPs managing VPN and firewall authentication across dozens of customer tenants will find Evo RADIUS cuts deployment friction; there's no self-hosted proxy to maintain, just cloud-native MFA enforcement with a multi-tenant dashboard built for that operational model. The vendor's NIST CSF 2.0 coverage of identity management and access control aligns with what you're buying,authentication done right, nothing more. Skip this if your organization needs RADIUS as one component of a broader identity platform; Evo is purpose-built for access layer hardening, not directory integration or policy orchestration.
SMB and mid-market teams managing on-premises or hybrid Active Directory environments need UserLock for context-aware access control that blocks compromised credentials even after MFA bypass. The tool maps directly to NIST PR.AA by enforcing device posture and location checks before granting logon, not just at initial authentication. Skip this if your infrastructure is cloud-native or you lack Active Directory as a core identity system; UserLock's value collapses without AD to anchor on.
