Evidian Enterprise Single Sign-On vs Microsoft Entra ID: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Evidian Enterprise Single Sign-On

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing mixed application estates,legacy mainframes alongside SaaS,should pick Evidian Enterprise Single Sign-On for its non-intrusive deployment that doesn't require application rewrites. The platform handles web, desktop, and legacy systems without modification, and its password lifecycle management with MFA support aligns directly with NIST PR.AA Identity Management controls. Skip this if your environment is purely cloud-native SaaS; you'll pay for legacy support you don't need when purpose-built cloud IAM platforms offer simpler administration.

Microsoft Entra ID

Enterprise and mid-market teams already committed to Microsoft 365 should choose Microsoft Entra ID because it eliminates the identity tax of managing a separate platform, with conditional access policies that actually enforce what your Microsoft-native apps require. NIST CSF 2.0 coverage on PR.AA (Identity Management, Authentication, and Access Control) is solid, and the integration with Security Copilot means threat investigation workflows stay within your existing Microsoft ecosystem rather than forcing context-switching. Skip this if you need deep API governance or fine-grained entitlements for non-Microsoft SaaS applications; Entra ID treats those as secondary use cases, and you'll end up stitching in third-party tools anyway.