eSHARE vs Wire: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
eSHARE is a commercial data loss prevention tool by eSHARE. Wire is a commercial data loss prevention tool by Wire. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best data loss prevention fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing Microsoft 365 collaboration will pick eSHARE to eliminate guest account sprawl without sacrificing external file sharing, a common friction point between security and business units. The tool enforces DLP policies natively within M365 while keeping data resident in your tenant, which maps directly to PR.AA and PR.DS controls under NIST CSF 2.0. Skip this if your organization needs DLP enforcement across non-Microsoft SaaS applications or prioritizes on-premises deployment; eSHARE is built specifically for M365-first shops that want governance without the operational debt of managing external user accounts.
Teams in regulated industries handling sensitive cross-border communications will find Wire's zero-knowledge architecture a genuine differentiator; your data stays encrypted end-to-end even from Wire itself, which matters when compliance officers ask who has access. The Swiss jurisdiction, on-premises deployment option, and NIST PR.DS alignment on data confidentiality give you the audit trail regulators want. Skip Wire if your primary need is detecting insider threats or lateral movement; this is communications security, not endpoint detection, and it assumes your users are the ones you're trying to protect from external compromise.
