Enclave vs NoPorts: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Enclave: ZTNA platform replacing VPNs with direct, policy-driven encrypted connectivity. built by Enclave. Core capabilities include Direct peer-to-peer device connectivity without VPN servers or open firewall ports, Cloud-based visual policy engine for defining and managing access controls, Automatic end-to-end encryption for all connections..

NoPorts: Zero-open-port remote access via cryptographic identity-first connectivity. built by Atsign. Core capabilities include No inbound listening ports required on protected assets, Cryptographic identity-based authentication for all participants, End-to-end encrypted sessions between authorized parties..

Both serve the Zero Trust Network Access market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Enclave differentiates with Direct peer-to-peer device connectivity without VPN servers or open firewall ports, Cloud-based visual policy engine for defining and managing access controls, Automatic end-to-end encryption for all connections. NoPorts differentiates with No inbound listening ports required on protected assets, Cryptographic identity-based authentication for all participants, End-to-end encrypted sessions between authorized parties.

Enclave is developed by Enclave. NoPorts is developed by Atsign. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

Enclave and NoPorts serve similar Zero Trust Network Access use cases: both are Zero Trust Network Access tools, both cover ZTNA, Remote Access, Microsegmentation. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.