enclaive Buckypaper CVMs vs Orca Security CWPP: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

enclaive Buckypaper CVMs

Enterprise and mid-market teams handling regulated workloads or processing sensitive data in untrusted cloud environments should pick enclaive Buckypaper CVMs for hardware-enforced isolation that doesn't require rebuilding infrastructure. The 3% CPU overhead is legitimate; most confidential computing approaches tax performance far more heavily, and EU datacenter deployment with ISO 27001 and C5 compliance removes friction for regulated industries. Skip this if your threat model is insider threats alone or you lack the technical depth to manage hardware-backed enclaves; Buckypaper requires operators who understand confidential execution environments, not just VM operators.

Orca Security CWPP

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing multi-cloud infrastructure will value Orca Security CWPP for its agentless scanning approach, which eliminates the operational friction of deploying agents across thousands of VMs and containers. The SideScanning technology covers workload inventory, vulnerability detection, malware, and runtime protection without requiring kernel instrumentation, cutting deployment time compared to agent-based competitors. Teams focused primarily on proactive vulnerability and configuration hunting will find it effective; teams expecting real-time incident response or SIEM integration should look elsewhere, as Orca prioritizes asset discovery and risk prioritization over reactive threat hunting.