EasySec ThinGUARD 2.0 vs swIDch PLC OTAC: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

EasySec ThinGUARD 2.0: OT-native zero-trust platform with device-level access control for IIoT. built by EasySec Solutions. Core capabilities include Device-level access control to prevent unauthorized access, lateral movement, and insider threats, Policy-based network isolation between OT functional units, End-to-end encryption for OT device data and commands based on access permissions..

swIDch PLC OTAC: MFA solution for OT devices using dynamic one-time authentication codes. built by swidch. Core capabilities include Dynamic one-time authentication code generation, Passwordless authentication for OT devices, Support for PLC, RTU, SCADA, and HMI devices..

Both serve the Industrial Control System Security market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

EasySec ThinGUARD 2.0 differentiates with Device-level access control to prevent unauthorized access, lateral movement, and insider threats, Policy-based network isolation between OT functional units, End-to-end encryption for OT device data and commands based on access permissions. swIDch PLC OTAC differentiates with Dynamic one-time authentication code generation, Passwordless authentication for OT devices, Support for PLC, RTU, SCADA, and HMI devices.

EasySec ThinGUARD 2.0 is developed by EasySec Solutions. swIDch PLC OTAC is developed by swidch. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

EasySec ThinGUARD 2.0 and swIDch PLC OTAC serve similar Industrial Control System Security use cases: both are Industrial Control System Security tools, both cover SCADA. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.