EasySec ThinGUARD 2.0 vs ProSoft Secure Remote Connectivity: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

EasySec ThinGUARD 2.0: OT-native zero-trust platform with device-level access control for IIoT. built by EasySec Solutions. Core capabilities include Device-level access control to prevent unauthorized access, lateral movement, and insider threats, Policy-based network isolation between OT functional units, End-to-end encryption for OT device data and commands based on access permissions..

ProSoft Secure Remote Connectivity: Industrial secure remote access platform for OT equipment monitoring. built by ProSoft Technology Inc. Core capabilities include Token-based two-factor authentication, User-configurable password policy, Role-based user and device access control..

Both serve the Industrial Control System Security market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

EasySec ThinGUARD 2.0 differentiates with Device-level access control to prevent unauthorized access, lateral movement, and insider threats, Policy-based network isolation between OT functional units, End-to-end encryption for OT device data and commands based on access permissions. ProSoft Secure Remote Connectivity differentiates with Token-based two-factor authentication, User-configurable password policy, Role-based user and device access control.

EasySec ThinGUARD 2.0 is developed by EasySec Solutions. ProSoft Secure Remote Connectivity is developed by ProSoft Technology Inc. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

EasySec ThinGUARD 2.0 and ProSoft Secure Remote Connectivity serve similar Industrial Control System Security use cases: both are Industrial Control System Security tools, both cover SCADA. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.