drydock vs Trend Micro Container Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
drydock is a free container security tool. Trend Micro Container Security is a commercial container security tool by Trend Micro. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best container security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
DevOps teams running Docker in CI/CD pipelines need Drydock because it audits container images against CIS benchmarks before they hit production, catching misconfigurations that scanners miss. The tool ships with customizable profiles and JSON output, so you can integrate it directly into your build process without manual remediation work. Skip this if your organization requires a graphical dashboard or runtime monitoring; Drydock is audit-focused and doesn't track container behavior after deployment.
Trend Micro Container Security
Teams running Kubernetes in regulated industries should pick Trend Micro Container Security for its policy-based admission control paired with runtime drift detection, which catches both misconfiguration and active compromise in the same workflow. The platform covers NIST ID.RA through DE.AE, meaning it handles risk assessment and continuous monitoring without leaving gaps between what's approved at deploy time and what actually runs. Skip this if you need deep integration with existing SIEM tooling or if your team lacks Kubernetes expertise; the admission control policy syntax rewards operators who already think in Kubernetes primitives.
