Drata Compliance as Code vs Root Compliance Proofwork: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Drata Compliance as Code

Development teams shipping to AWS, Azure, or GCP need to stop treating compliance as a gate at the end of the pipeline, and Drata Compliance as Code forces that shift by embedding controls directly into pull requests and infrastructure-as-code scanning. The platform covers PR.PS Platform Security and ID.RA Risk Assessment across 90+ integrations, meaning misconfigurations get caught before they reach production instead of during audit season. Skip this if your organization runs mostly on-premises workloads or needs heavy post-deployment forensics; Drata assumes you're cloud-native and wants prevention, not investigation.

Root Compliance Proofwork

Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in manual compliance evidence collection will find genuine relief in Root Compliance Proofwork because it generates cryptographically signed artifacts on demand rather than forcing your engineers to hunt down screenshots and logs. The tool covers FedRAMP, CMMC 2.0, SOC 2, PCI DSS, and ISO 27001 with one-click exports, plus continuous monitoring against CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities list, which actually moves the needle on audit cycle time. Skip this if your organization runs primarily on-premises infrastructure or needs the supply chain risk mapping that other vendors bake in; Proofwork optimizes for evidence generation over upstream SBOM analysis.