Dirtyc0w Docker POC vs XlsGen: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Dirtyc0w Docker POC is a free offensive security tool. XlsGen is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security researchers and red team operators validating Docker container hardening need Dirtyc0w Docker POC because it isolates the exact privilege escalation path that AppArmor profiles must block, turning a 2016 kernel vulnerability into a concrete test case. The 14 GitHub stars underscore it's a niche tool with a tight community rather than broad adoption, but that's the point: it cuts through abstraction and forces you to verify your mitigation actually works. Skip this if you're looking for a general-purpose container penetration testing framework; this is deliberately narrow, targeting one exploit on one workload to answer one question.
Penetration testers and red teamers who need to generate weaponized Excel files without touching a Windows machine will move faster with XlsGen; it generates BIFF8 files with 4.0 macros in pure code, eliminating the dependency on Microsoft Office entirely. The 44 GitHub stars reflect steady adoption among practitioners who've already ditched Excel-dependent macro generation workflows. Skip this if your team relies on social engineering payloads that need Office Open XML fidelity or modern macro obfuscation; XlsGen prioritizes delivery speed over evasion depth.
