Dirtyc0w Docker POC vs LaZagne Project: 2026 Comparison
Dirtyc0w Docker POC is a free offensive security tool. LaZagne Project is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security researchers and red team operators validating Docker container hardening need Dirtyc0w Docker POC because it isolates the exact privilege escalation path that AppArmor profiles must block, turning a 2016 kernel vulnerability into a concrete test case. The 14 GitHub stars underscore it's a niche tool with a tight community rather than broad adoption, but that's the point: it cuts through abstraction and forces you to verify your mitigation actually works. Skip this if you're looking for a general-purpose container penetration testing framework; this is deliberately narrow, targeting one exploit on one workload to answer one question.
Penetration testers and red team operators conducting post-exploitation assessments need LaZagne Project for its breadth of credential extraction across 30+ applications and operating systems in a single pass. The tool's 10,713 GitHub stars and active maintenance reflect genuine adoption in offensive security workflows where speed matters more than stealth. This is not a fit for organizations seeking continuous endpoint monitoring; LaZagne is explicitly designed for one-time local execution during authorized engagements, not persistent credential discovery.
