What is the difference between Digital Type vs Maro?

**Digital Type**: Cybersecurity platform combining human risk assessment with behavioural science,. built by TNK. Core capabilities include Analytics Dashboard, Sentiment Analysis, Digital Behaviour.. **Maro**: Monitors workforce AI usage and enforces behavioral security policies in real time. built by Maro. Core capabilities include AI app usage observability across the workforce, Real-time behavioral intervention and redirection, AI usage policy creation and deployment.. Both serve the User and Entity Behavior Analytics market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

What features do Digital Type vs Maro offer?

**Digital Type** differentiates with Analytics Dashboard, Sentiment Analysis, Digital Behaviour. **Maro** differentiates with AI app usage observability across the workforce, Real-time behavioral intervention and redirection, AI usage policy creation and deployment.

Who makes Digital Type vs Maro?

**Digital Type** is developed by TNK founded in 2021-01-01T00:00:00.000Z. **Maro** is developed by Maro. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Is Digital Type a good alternative to Maro?

Digital Type and Maro serve similar User and Entity Behavior Analytics use cases: both are User and Entity Behavior Analytics tools. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

Digital Type vs Maro: 2026 Comparison Guide | CybersecTools

Digital Type vs Maro: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.

Digital Type is a commercial user and entity behavior analytics tool by TNK. Maro is a commercial user and entity behavior analytics tool by Maro. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best user and entity behavior analytics fit for your security stack.

CST Verdict

Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:

Digital Type

Startup security teams managing insider risk without dedicated headcount should start with Digital Type, since its behavioral science layer catches risky user patterns that traditional access controls miss. The platform covers five NIST CSF 2.0 areas including continuous monitoring and risk assessment, and deployment takes weeks not months on cloud infrastructure. Skip this if you need deep forensics or incident response automation; Digital Type is built for prevention and early warning, not post-breach investigation.

Data verified May 2026