Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
DigiCert Secure Email (S/MIME) Certs is a commercial email encryption tool by DigiCert. Egress Protect is a commercial email encryption tool by Egress. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best email encryption fit for your security stack.
Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
DigiCert Secure Email (S/MIME) Certs
Organizations that need legally defensible email encryption without rebuilding their mail infrastructure should start with DigiCert Secure Email (S/MIME) Certs. S/MIME works natively in Outlook, Gmail, and Apple Mail, meaning adoption friction stays low and you avoid the gateway appliance tax. The tool maps directly to NIST PR.AA (authentication via public/private key pairs) and PR.DS (message-level confidentiality and integrity), covering the core email security control most compliance auditors actually care about. Skip this if your threat model demands perfect forward secrecy or sender anonymity; S/MIME signs identities, not conceals them.
Mid-market and enterprise teams protecting sensitive data in Microsoft 365 should choose Egress Protect for its post-send message control, which lets you revoke access and restrict forwarding even after recipients open encrypted email. The tool covers three NIST CSF 2.0 functions (PR.DS, PR.AA, DE.CM), with particular strength in access enforcement through granular controls and continuous audit trails that satisfy compliance auditors. Skip this if you need unified DLP across cloud storage, web, and endpoints; Egress Protect is email-centric and won't replace a platform-wide data loss prevention strategy.
S/MIME certificates for end-to-end email encryption and signing.
End-to-end email encryption with DLP and access controls for Microsoft 365
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPNo reviews yet
No reviews yet
Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
Common questions about comparing DigiCert Secure Email (S/MIME) Certs vs Egress Protect for your email encryption needs.
DigiCert Secure Email (S/MIME) Certs: S/MIME certificates for end-to-end email encryption and signing. built by DigiCert. Core capabilities include End-to-end email encryption using S/MIME, Digital message signing with public/private key pairs, Automated certificate request and delivery..
Egress Protect: End-to-end email encryption with DLP and access controls for Microsoft 365. built by Egress. Core capabilities include End-to-end email encryption with 256-bit AES, Automatic and sender-initiated encryption based on policies, Granular access controls to restrict forwarding, printing, copying, and downloading..
Both serve the Email Encryption market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.
DigiCert Secure Email (S/MIME) Certs differentiates with End-to-end email encryption using S/MIME, Digital message signing with public/private key pairs, Automated certificate request and delivery. Egress Protect differentiates with End-to-end email encryption with 256-bit AES, Automatic and sender-initiated encryption based on policies, Granular access controls to restrict forwarding, printing, copying, and downloading.
DigiCert Secure Email (S/MIME) Certs is developed by DigiCert. Egress Protect is developed by Egress. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.
DigiCert Secure Email (S/MIME) Certs integrates with Gmail, Yahoo Mail, Microsoft Outlook, Apple Mail. Egress Protect integrates with Microsoft 365, Microsoft Office 365, Outlook, Outlook Web Access, Microsoft Purview Information Protection and 3 more. Check integration compatibility with your existing security stack before deciding.
DigiCert Secure Email (S/MIME) Certs and Egress Protect serve similar Email Encryption use cases: both are Email Encryption tools, both cover Encryption. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.
Get strategic cybersecurity insights in your inbox