CyberArk Identity Security Platform vs Cyolo Remote Privileged Access: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

CyberArk Identity Security Platform

Enterprise and mid-market teams managing hybrid infrastructure with heavy privileged access requirements should build around CyberArk Identity Security Platform for its endpoint privilege management, which actually removes local admin rights rather than just monitoring them. The platform covers three NIST CSF 2.0 categories (PR.AA authentication, PR.PS platform security, and DE.CM monitoring) with particular strength in privileged credential lifecycle orchestration across cloud and on-premises assets. Skip this if your environment is cloud-only SaaS; the complexity and pricing favor organizations with substantial legacy systems and distributed privileged accounts that justify the operational overhead.

Cyolo Remote Privileged Access

Mid-market and enterprise teams protecting OT/ICS environments will find Cyolo Remote Privileged Access most valuable for its agentless architecture, which sidesteps the deployment friction that kills PAM projects in operational technology shops running legacy hardware. The vendor's support for OEM vendor access management directly addresses NIST PR.AA (limiting asset access to authorized users) without requiring agents on control systems that can't tolerate them. Skip this if your priority is insider threat detection or forensic depth; Cyolo maps cleanly to access control and session recording but doesn't prioritize the incident analysis capabilities that threat-hunting teams demand.