CYCL CDR+AI SOC vs Upwind Application Runtime Protection: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

CYCL CDR+AI SOC

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in cloud alert noise will appreciate CYCL CDR+AI SOC's behavioral AI that actually separates signal from incident, paired with a managed 24/7 SOC that validates and responds without requiring you to staff threat hunters. The agentless architecture means no deployment friction across your cloud estate, and the automated response engine handles isolation and user disabling faster than your on-call engineer can read the alert. Skip this if your team wants to own every step of incident response; the strength here is outsourcing investigation and mitigation to BugSec's analysts, not building internal capabilities.

Upwind Application Runtime Protection

Mid-market and enterprise security teams operating containerized workloads across multiple cloud providers should choose Upwind Application Runtime Protection for its eBPF sensor visibility paired with cloud log correlation, which catches runtime anomalies that purely agent-based or agentless tools miss. The platform covers four critical NIST CSF 2.0 functions across detection and response, with particular strength in DE.CM and DE.AE for continuous behavioral baselining. Skip this if you need CSPM or vulnerability management bundled in; Upwind is strictly a runtime detection and response tool, not a platform play.