Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
cyberelements Single Sign On is a commercial multi-factor authentication and single sign-on tool by Systancia. Progress ShareFile User Authentication is a commercial multi-factor authentication and single sign-on tool by ShareFile. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best multi-factor authentication and single sign-on fit for your security stack.
Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise teams managing hybrid Windows environments with strict regulatory requirements will get the most from cyberelements Single Sign On, particularly for its offline-capable password vault and eCPS/smart card authentication that satisfies European healthcare and government compliance. The hybrid deployment model with configurable local cache means access doesn't break when the network does, a real advantage over cloud-only competitors in disconnected scenarios. Skip this if your infrastructure is primarily SaaS-based or you need deep integrations beyond Active Directory and VPN; the vendor's 27-person footprint means feature velocity is slower than larger platforms.
Progress ShareFile User Authentication
Mid-market and enterprise teams standardizing on ShareFile for file sharing will find Progress ShareFile User Authentication the natural fit because it eliminates the friction of bolting on a separate MFA provider. Password policy enforcement, SAML 2.0 SSO, and device lock-and-wipe capabilities align directly with NIST's Identity Management function without adding integration overhead. Skip this if you need adaptive authentication or passwordless options; Progress is playing the traditional MFA and policy game, not reimagining it.
Authentication & access mgmt solution with SSO, MFA, and password vault
User authentication features for ShareFile file sharing platform
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPNo reviews yet
No reviews yet
Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
Common questions about comparing cyberelements Single Sign On vs Progress ShareFile User Authentication for your multi-factor authentication and single sign-on needs.
cyberelements Single Sign On: Authentication & access mgmt solution with SSO, MFA, and password vault. built by Systancia. Core capabilities include Single sign-on for Windows and web applications, Multi-factor authentication with cards, OTP, biometrics, and eCPS, Centralized password vault with local offline cache..
Progress ShareFile User Authentication: User authentication features for ShareFile file sharing platform. built by ShareFile. Core capabilities include Password policy management with configurable requirements, Multi-factor authentication with one-time codes and tokens, Single sign-on with SAML 2.0 support..
Both serve the Multi-Factor Authentication and Single Sign-On market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.
cyberelements Single Sign On differentiates with Single sign-on for Windows and web applications, Multi-factor authentication with cards, OTP, biometrics, and eCPS, Centralized password vault with local offline cache. Progress ShareFile User Authentication differentiates with Password policy management with configurable requirements, Multi-factor authentication with one-time codes and tokens, Single sign-on with SAML 2.0 support.
cyberelements Single Sign On is developed by Systancia. Progress ShareFile User Authentication is developed by ShareFile. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.
cyberelements Single Sign On and Progress ShareFile User Authentication serve similar Multi-Factor Authentication and Single Sign-On use cases: both are Multi-Factor Authentication and Single Sign-On tools, both cover Authentication, Password Management. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.
Get strategic cybersecurity insights in your inbox