tryharder vs Shellcode2PE: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
tryharder is a free offensive security tool. Shellcode2PE is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Red teamers and penetration testers running Sliver or custom shellcode payloads will get the most from tryharder because its staged loader actually evades common memory inspection hooks that off-the-shelf loaders fail against. The 97 GitHub stars and active maintenance suggest real operators are shipping this in engagements, which is more meaningful than a vendor benchmark here. Skip this if your team needs post-exploitation frameworks or C2 infrastructure; tryharder does one thing, loader evasion, and stops there.
Red teamers and penetration testers who need to weaponize raw shellcode without touching a compiler will move fastest with Shellcode2PE. It converts shellcode directly into executable PE binaries in one command, eliminating the manual encoding steps that slow down engagement delivery; the 127 GitHub stars and active Python codebase confirm it's actually used in the field. Skip this if your team runs primarily on macOS or Linux, or if you need post-exploitation staging,Shellcode2PE is Windows-payload focused and doesn't handle obfuscation or evasion on its own.
