tryharder vs Mortar: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
tryharder is a free offensive security tool. Mortar is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Red teamers and penetration testers running Sliver or custom shellcode payloads will get the most from tryharder because its staged loader actually evades common memory inspection hooks that off-the-shelf loaders fail against. The 97 GitHub stars and active maintenance suggest real operators are shipping this in engagements, which is more meaningful than a vendor benchmark here. Skip this if your team needs post-exploitation frameworks or C2 infrastructure; tryharder does one thing, loader evasion, and stops there.
Red teamers and penetration testers validating their own detection coverage should use Mortar to systematically test whether your EDR and XDR actually catch what you think they catch. The tool's free pricing and 1,501 GitHub stars reflect genuine adoption among practitioners who need to simulate evasion techniques without licensing friction. Skip this if you're looking for a commercial product with vendor support or want something that doubles as a monitoring platform; Mortar is a testing harness, not a detection layer.
