tryharder vs EvilClippy: 2026 Comparison
tryharder is a free offensive security tool. EvilClippy is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Red teamers and penetration testers running Sliver or custom shellcode payloads will get the most from tryharder because its staged loader actually evades common memory inspection hooks that off-the-shelf loaders fail against. The 97 GitHub stars and active maintenance suggest real operators are shipping this in engagements, which is more meaningful than a vendor benchmark here. Skip this if your team needs post-exploitation frameworks or C2 infrastructure; tryharder does one thing, loader evasion, and stops there.
Red teamers and penetration testers validating macro-based attack chains will find EvilClippy indispensable; it generates weaponized Office documents with VBA obfuscation and sandbox evasion in minutes, cutting reconnaissance time on engagements where social engineering is the attack vector. The 2,235 GitHub stars and active maintenance across Windows, macOS, and Linux indicate it's the standard tool for this exact workflow. Skip it if your objective is testing detection tuning or EDR response; EvilClippy prioritizes payload delivery over post-compromise simulation, so teams hunting for evasion gaps will need to pair it with endpoint logging and monitoring separately.
