Covenant vs Ebowla: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Covenant is a free offensive security tool. Ebowla is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Red teamers and security engineers running internal assessments will find Covenant's .NET-native C2 architecture invaluable for simulating attacks that bypass standard logging and detection; the 4,641 GitHub stars reflect active community maintenance and real-world deployment at scale. Its collaborative operator interface and task-based workflow beat Metasploit for team-based engagements, especially when you need parallel execution across multiple targets. Not for buyers seeking a fully managed platform or cross-platform flexibility; Covenant's .NET focus and steeper learning curve make it a specialist tool, not a replacement for commercial red team frameworks.
Penetration testers and red teamers who need fast, modular payload generation across Windows and Linux targets should use Ebowla for its native support of Reflective DLL injection without external dependencies. The tool's 761 GitHub stars and active maintenance signal real adoption in offensive workflows where payload obfuscation and language flexibility matter more than UI polish. Skip this if your team needs a full-featured C2 framework or graphical payload builder; Ebowla is command-line first and assumes you know what you're injecting.
