Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Core Security Outflank Security Tooling is a commercial offensive security tool by Core Security. Havoc Framework is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise red teams will find Outflank Security Tooling essential for testing EDR bypass at scale; its steganography-based payload concealment and unpublished EDR evasion techniques let operators validate detection gaps that commodity toolkits can't expose. The continuous operator documentation and Cobalt Strike integration mean your team stays current as vendors patch, and on-premises deployment keeps artifacts off shared infrastructure. Skip this if your mandate is offensive security without a specific EDR validation requirement; Outflank assumes you're already comfortable with advanced post-exploitation and are hunting for the gaps most red teams never find.
Red teams and penetration testers building custom C2 infrastructure will find Havoc's malleable profiles and team collaboration features faster to operationalize than Cobalt Strike, especially at zero cost. The 8,200-plus GitHub stars reflect active community contribution to payload obfuscation and evasion techniques that actually work against modern defenses. Skip this if your priority is managed C2 services or Windows-only operations; Havoc's strength is flexibility for operators who want to own their implant behavior, not outsource it.
Red team toolkit for EDR evasion, initial access, and post-exploitation.
Open-source C2 framework for red team ops and adversary simulation.
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPNo reviews yet
No reviews yet
Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
Common questions about comparing Core Security Outflank Security Tooling vs Havoc Framework for your offensive security needs.
Core Security Outflank Security Tooling: Red team toolkit for EDR evasion, initial access, and post-exploitation. built by Core Security. Core capabilities include Advanced payload generation with AV/EDR evasion and anti-forensic capabilities, Office Intrusion Pack for phishing via malicious MS Office macros, Steganography-based payload concealment within image files..
Havoc Framework: Open-source C2 framework for red team ops and adversary simulation. Core capabilities include Multi-operator collaborative teamserver, HTTP/HTTPS and SMB listener support, Demon implant/agent with in-memory execution..
Both serve the Offensive Security market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.
Core Security Outflank Security Tooling differentiates with Advanced payload generation with AV/EDR evasion and anti-forensic capabilities, Office Intrusion Pack for phishing via malicious MS Office macros, Steganography-based payload concealment within image files. Havoc Framework differentiates with Multi-operator collaborative teamserver, HTTP/HTTPS and SMB listener support, Demon implant/agent with in-memory execution.
Core Security Outflank Security Tooling is developed by Core Security. Havoc Framework is open-source with 8,237 GitHub stars. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.
Core Security Outflank Security Tooling and Havoc Framework serve similar Offensive Security use cases: both are Offensive Security tools, both cover C2, Red Team, Post Exploitation. Key differences: Core Security Outflank Security Tooling is Commercial while Havoc Framework is Free, Havoc Framework is open-source. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.
Get strategic cybersecurity insights in your inbox