Collective Intelligence Framework (CIF) vs Lunar: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Collective Intelligence Framework (CIF) is a free threat intelligence platforms tool. Lunar is a free threat intelligence platforms tool by Webz.io. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best threat intelligence platforms fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Collective Intelligence Framework (CIF)
Security teams drowning in threat feeds will move faster with Collective Intelligence Framework because it's built to normalize messy indicator data into actionable intelligence without the overhead of commercial platforms. CIF processes and correlates indicators from dozens of sources at scale, turning raw feeds into deduplicated, enriched intelligence that your analysts can actually query and act on in minutes instead of days. Skip this if your organization needs managed threat feeds or pre-built integrations with your SIEM; CIF demands hands-on engineering to customize pipelines and maintain data quality, which is why it works best at shops with dedicated threat intel staff who control their own infrastructure.
Security teams managing breach aftermath and credential exposure across multiple domains should adopt Lunar for its real-time infostealer log intelligence, which surfaces compromised credentials faster than waiting for breach notifications. The platform ingests large-scale daily breach data and prioritizes service-level context for remediation, directly supporting the NIST Detect function of continuous monitoring and incident characterization. Skip this if you need post-compromise forensics or threat hunting beyond credential validation; Lunar is detection and alerting first, not investigation.
